Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
45
MOO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$73.02
Seasonality move
:
-0.96%
Day range:
$72.65 - $73.08
52-week range:
$59.58 - $76.19
Dividend yield:
3.02%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
106.2K
Avg. volume:
76.1K
1-year change:
0.25%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
$72.99 | -- | -- | -- | $2.20 | 3.02% | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
$19.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 1.35% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$30.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.15% | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
$52.68 | -- | -- | -- | $1.21 | 2.29% | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
$70.15 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 2.96% | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
$49.14 | -- | -- | -- | $1.28 | 2.61% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | 0.918 | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | 0.862 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.845 | -- | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | 0.627 | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | 1.252 | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | 2.095 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AQWA
Global X Clean Water ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MOO or AQWA?
Global X Clean Water ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Clean Water ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MOO or AQWA?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Clean Water ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Agribusiness ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Clean Water ETF, analysts believe VanEck Agribusiness ETF is more attractive than Global X Clean Water ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF0 0 0 AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF0 0 0 -
Is MOO or AQWA More Risky?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Clean Water ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MOO or AQWA?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Global X Clean Water ETF offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. VanEck Agribusiness ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Clean Water ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MOO or AQWA?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Clean Water ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Clean Water ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Agribusiness ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Clean Water ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Agribusiness ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Clean Water ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- -- AQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MOO or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MOO or CUT?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Agribusiness ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe VanEck Agribusiness ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is MOO or CUT More Risky?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.551%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MOO or CUT?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. VanEck Agribusiness ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MOO or CUT?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Agribusiness ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Agribusiness ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MOO or HAP?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MOO or HAP?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Natural Resources ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Agribusiness ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Natural Resources ETF, analysts believe VanEck Agribusiness ETF is more attractive than VanEck Natural Resources ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF0 0 0 HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 -
Is MOO or HAP More Risky?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.381%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MOO or HAP?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. VanEck Natural Resources ETF offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. VanEck Agribusiness ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MOO or HAP?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Agribusiness ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Natural Resources ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Agribusiness ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Natural Resources ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- -- HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MOO or SLX?
VanEck Steel ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MOO or SLX?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Steel ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Agribusiness ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Steel ETF, analysts believe VanEck Agribusiness ETF is more attractive than VanEck Steel ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF0 0 0 SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 -
Is MOO or SLX More Risky?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.835%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MOO or SLX?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. VanEck Steel ETF offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share. VanEck Agribusiness ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Steel ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MOO or SLX?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Steel ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Agribusiness ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Steel ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Agribusiness ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Steel ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MOO or URNM?
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MOO or URNM?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Agribusiness ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, analysts believe VanEck Agribusiness ETF is more attractive than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF0 0 0 URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is MOO or URNM More Risky?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a beta of 0.963, which suggesting that the stock is 3.712% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a beta of 1.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.634%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MOO or URNM?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a quarterly dividend of $2.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.02%. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. VanEck Agribusiness ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MOO or URNM?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Agribusiness ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Agribusiness ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
80
SOC alert for Jul 18
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 8.93% over the past day.
Buy
71
PGY alert for Jul 18
Pagaya Technologies [PGY] is up 4.71% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 0.52% over the past day.
