Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
67
AUSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$45.09
Seasonality move
:
2.31%
Day range:
$44.62 - $45.18
52-week range:
$38.55 - $45.92
Dividend yield:
2.81%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
120.7K
Avg. volume:
105.9K
1-year change:
7.67%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
$45.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 2.81% | -- |
|
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
|
$53.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 1.87% | -- |
|
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
|
$129.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 1.9% | -- |
|
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
$110.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.92 | 3.14% | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
$125.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 0.9% | -- |
|
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
|
$32.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 3.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.625 | -- | -- |
|
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
|
-- | 0.805 | -- | -- |
|
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
|
-- | 0.707 | -- | -- |
|
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
-- | 0.753 | -- | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
-- | 1.262 | -- | -- |
|
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
|
-- | 0.892 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or FTDS?
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Dividend Strength ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- FTDSFirst Trust Dividend Strength ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or FTDS?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Dividend Strength ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Dividend Strength ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than First Trust Dividend Strength ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 FTDSFirst Trust Dividend Strength ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or FTDS More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Dividend Strength ETF has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.927%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or FTDS?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. First Trust Dividend Strength ETF offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Dividend Strength ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or FTDS?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Dividend Strength ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Dividend Strength ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Dividend Strength ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Dividend Strength ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- FTDSFirst Trust Dividend Strength ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or ONEV?
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- ONEVSPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or ONEV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 ONEVSPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or ONEV More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.792%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or ONEV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or ONEV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- ONEVSPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or ONEY?
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- ONEYSPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or ONEY?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 ONEYSPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or ONEY More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF has a beta of 0.944, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.627%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or ONEY?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or ONEY?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- ONEYSPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or PKW?
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- PKWInvesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or PKW?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 PKWInvesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or PKW More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.022%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or PKW?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or PKW?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- PKWInvesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or SPDV?
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- SPDVAAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or SPDV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 SPDVAAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or SPDV More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.754, which suggesting that the stock is 24.606% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.422%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or SPDV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or SPDV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- SPDVAAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
71
PGY alert for Jul 18
Pagaya Technologies [PGY] is up 3.66% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 0.07% over the past day.
Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 4.34% over the past day.
