VVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of 9.33% compared to Valvoline's net margin of --. Valvoline's return on equity of 160.95% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $42.62, signalling upside risk potential of 19.04%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 936.59%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.114%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $403.2M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. Valvoline's net income of $37.6M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.77x versus 0.06x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of 9.33% compared to Valvoline's net margin of -58.5%. Valvoline's return on equity of 160.95% beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -138.7%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $42.62, signalling upside risk potential of 19.04%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.15 which suggests that it could grow by 90.37%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.826%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $403.2M, which are larger than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $97.6M. Valvoline's net income of $37.6M is higher than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$57.1M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.77x versus 0.65x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of 9.33% compared to Valvoline's net margin of 1.07%. Valvoline's return on equity of 160.95% beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $42.62, signalling upside risk potential of 19.04%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $21.31 which suggests that it could grow by 22.81%. Given that Driven Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe Driven Brands Holdings is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $403.2M, which are smaller than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $516.2M. Valvoline's net income of $37.6M is higher than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 391.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.77x versus 1.22x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of 9.33% compared to Valvoline's net margin of 10.32%. Valvoline's return on equity of 160.95% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 8.24%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $42.62, signalling upside risk potential of 19.04%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 45.8%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.176, which suggesting that the stock is 17.585% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $403.2M, which are larger than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $261.7M. Valvoline's net income of $37.6M is higher than Mister Car Wash's net income of $27M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 25.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.77x versus 2.09x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.