SVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duluth Holdings has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of -14.89%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 5.95% beat Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68%.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.88, signalling upside risk potential of 30.05%. On the other hand Duluth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.85%. Given that Savers Value Village has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Savers Value Village is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.779%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duluth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duluth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $370.1M, which are larger than Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues of $102.7M. Savers Value Village's net income of -$4.7M is higher than Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.00x while Duluth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 1.05x versus 0.11x for Duluth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Etsy has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of -8%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 5.95% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.88, signalling upside risk potential of 30.05%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $52.57 which suggests that it could fall by -6.19%. Given that Savers Value Village has higher upside potential than Etsy, analysts believe Savers Value Village is more attractive than Etsy.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.791%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $370.1M, which are smaller than Etsy quarterly revenues of $651.2M. Savers Value Village's net income of -$4.7M is higher than Etsy's net income of -$52.1M. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.00x while Etsy's PE ratio is 40.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 1.05x versus 2.48x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of 1.14%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 5.95% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44%.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.88, signalling upside risk potential of 30.05%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 566.67%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Savers Value Village, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Savers Value Village.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.942%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 17.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $370.1M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Savers Value Village's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.00x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 84.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 1.05x versus 1.21x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Savers Value Village's net margin of 5.17%. Savers Value Village's return on equity of 5.95% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Savers Value Village has a consensus price target of $12.88, signalling upside risk potential of 30.05%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $55.05 which suggests that it could fall by -1.76%. Given that Savers Value Village has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Savers Value Village is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Savers Value Village has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.604%.

Savers Value Village has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Savers Value Village pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Savers Value Village quarterly revenues are $370.1M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Savers Value Village's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Savers Value Village's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.00x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Savers Value Village is 1.05x versus 2.01x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.