SPGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 3.23%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $591.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.85%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $309.19 which suggests that it could fall by -22.35%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 74.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.23x versus 15.48x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 25.37%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat FactSet Research Systems's return on equity of 26.63%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $591.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.85%. On the other hand FactSet Research Systems has an analysts' consensus of $443.54 which suggests that it could grow by 1.65%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than FactSet Research Systems, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than FactSet Research Systems.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.278%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. FactSet Research Systems offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than FactSet Research Systems quarterly revenues of $585.5M. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than FactSet Research Systems's net income of $148.5M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while FactSet Research Systems's PE ratio is 31.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.23x versus 7.34x for FactSet Research Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of 24.68%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 10.23%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $591.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.85%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $198.59 which suggests that it could grow by 9.84%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Intercontinental Exchange, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Intercontinental Exchange.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.111, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.069%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 37.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3.2B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $797M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 37.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.23x versus 8.55x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 28.86% compared to S&P Global's net margin of -6.09%. S&P Global's return on equity of 10.35% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 3.58%.

S&P Global has a consensus price target of $591.75, signalling upside risk potential of 12.85%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $152.43 which suggests that it could grow by 6.56%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than KKR &, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than KKR &.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.188, which suggesting that the stock is 18.844% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.883, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.259%.

S&P Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. S&P Global pays 29.44% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

S&P Global quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than KKR & quarterly revenues of $3.1B. S&P Global's net income of $1.1B is higher than KKR &'s net income of -$185.9M. Notably, S&P Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.19x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 61.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for S&P Global is 11.23x versus 8.81x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.