RJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

US Global Investors has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of -18.17%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Raymond James Financial has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Raymond James Financial is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.326%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Raymond James Financial's net income of $495M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.44x versus 3.68x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 1.3%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $86.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 0.988, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.154%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Raymond James Financial's net income of $495M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 17.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.44x versus 1.17x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 27.48%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $99.17 which suggests that it could grow by 7.45%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Raymond James Financial, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Raymond James Financial.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.442%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. Raymond James Financial's net income of $495M is higher than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.44x versus 5.58x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Raymond James Financial's net margin of 27.81%. Raymond James Financial's return on equity of 18.87% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 18.11%.

Raymond James Financial has a consensus price target of $166.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.52%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $101.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.69%. Given that Raymond James Financial has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Raymond James Financial is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 2.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.006%.

Raymond James Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. Raymond James Financial pays 18.52% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Raymond James Financial quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Raymond James Financial's net income of $495M is higher than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $490.5M. Notably, Raymond James Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raymond James Financial is 2.44x versus 3.23x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.