RGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 10.3%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.48% beat American International Group's return on equity of -4.32%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $244.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $90.31 which suggests that it could grow by 11.51%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than American International Group.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.434%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. American International Group offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $286M is lower than American International Group's net income of $698M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.63x versus 1.89x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AMERISAFE has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 12.32%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.48% beat AMERISAFE's return on equity of 16.54%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $244.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand AMERISAFE has an analysts' consensus of $56.33 which suggests that it could grow by 23.4%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than AMERISAFE, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than AMERISAFE.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.397, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.321%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. AMERISAFE offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE pays out 154.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Reinsurance Group of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AMERISAFE's is not.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than AMERISAFE quarterly revenues of $72.6M. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $286M is higher than AMERISAFE's net income of $8.9M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while AMERISAFE's PE ratio is 18.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.63x versus 2.90x for AMERISAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of -11.55%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.48% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $244.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $59.44 which suggests that it could grow by 16.35%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.372%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $286M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 6.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.63x versus 0.46x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 5.42% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 21%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.48% beat Primerica's return on equity of 23.29%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $244.11, signalling upside risk potential of 23.48%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $306.57 which suggests that it could grow by 14.8%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Primerica, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Primerica.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.681% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.058%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $804.8M. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $286M is higher than Primerica's net income of $169.1M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while Primerica's PE ratio is 17.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.63x versus 2.85x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.