OWL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 21.75%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 1.61% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 13.25%.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 12.65%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $159.17 which suggests that it could fall by -4.07%. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than Blackstone, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than Blackstone.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.958%.

Blue Owl Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Blue Owl Capital pays 336.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues are $683.5M, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Blue Owl Capital's net income of $7.4M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $614.9M. Notably, Blue Owl Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.23x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 49.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Owl Capital is 6.70x versus 11.93x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Carlyle Group has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 19.51%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 1.61% beat The Carlyle Group's return on equity of 17.76%.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 12.65%. On the other hand The Carlyle Group has an analysts' consensus of $58.74 which suggests that it could grow by 0.95%. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than The Carlyle Group, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than The Carlyle Group.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.866, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.61%.

Blue Owl Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. The Carlyle Group offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Blue Owl Capital pays 336.12% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital's is not.

Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues are $683.5M, which are larger than The Carlyle Group quarterly revenues of $666.5M. Blue Owl Capital's net income of $7.4M is lower than The Carlyle Group's net income of $130M. Notably, Blue Owl Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.23x while The Carlyle Group's PE ratio is 19.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Owl Capital is 6.70x versus 6.16x for The Carlyle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 1.09% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of -18.17%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 1.61% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 0.34%.

Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $22.73, signalling upside risk potential of 12.65%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Owl Capital has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Blue Owl Capital is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.326%.

Blue Owl Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.79%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Blue Owl Capital pays 336.12% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blue Owl Capital's is not.

Blue Owl Capital quarterly revenues are $683.5M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Blue Owl Capital's net income of $7.4M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of -$382K. Notably, Blue Owl Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 155.23x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 79.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Owl Capital is 6.70x versus 3.68x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.