MSCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Moodys has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 32.48%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Moodys's return on equity of 54.49%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $627.07, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $512.26 which suggests that it could grow by 2.41%. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Moodys.

MSCI has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.928%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 30.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are smaller than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.9B. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is lower than Moodys's net income of $625M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.32x while Moodys's PE ratio is 43.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.38x versus 12.60x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 13.49%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $627.07, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $341.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.92%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than MSCI, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than MSCI.

MSCI has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.312%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are larger than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $581.9M. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is higher than Morningstar's net income of $78.5M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.32x while Morningstar's PE ratio is 32.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.38x versus 5.40x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 18.9%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $627.07, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $92.28 which suggests that it could grow by 3.64%. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Nasdaq.

MSCI has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.97700000000001%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2.1B. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $395M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.32x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 40.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.38x versus 6.60x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Value Line has a net margin of 38.7% compared to MSCI's net margin of 57.58%. MSCI's return on equity of -- beat Value Line's return on equity of 22.91%.

MSCI has a consensus price target of $627.07, signalling upside risk potential of 9.6%. On the other hand Value Line has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MSCI has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe MSCI is more attractive than Value Line.

MSCI has a beta of 1.317, which suggesting that the stock is 31.704% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Line has a beta of 1.061, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.082%.

MSCI has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Value Line offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. MSCI pays 45.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line pays out 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSCI quarterly revenues are $745.8M, which are larger than Value Line quarterly revenues of $9M. MSCI's net income of $288.6M is higher than Value Line's net income of $5.2M. Notably, MSCI's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.32x while Value Line's PE ratio is 17.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSCI is 15.38x versus 10.26x for Value Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.