MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 3.62%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $229.18 which suggests that it could grow by 17.15%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.333, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.698%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Allstate's PE ratio is 13.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.66x versus 0.80x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of -3.51%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $158.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.18%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.296%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 16.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.66x versus 2.12x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 7.31%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -3.41%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.478%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 14.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.66x versus 0.94x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of -7.77% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 8.55%. Mercury General's return on equity of 16.11% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.28%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.41%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.960, which suggesting that the stock is 3.964% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.821%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Mercury General's net income of -$108.3M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.00x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.66x versus 1.07x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.