MCB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

East West Bancorp has a net margin of 23.17% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 42.48%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 9.42% beat East West Bancorp's return on equity of 15.59%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.78%. On the other hand East West Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $114.31 which suggests that it could grow by 8.34%. Given that East West Bancorp has higher upside potential than Metropolitan Bank Holding, analysts believe East West Bancorp is more attractive than Metropolitan Bank Holding.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.324% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison East West Bancorp has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.551%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. East West Bancorp offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. East West Bancorp pays out 26.47% of its earnings as a dividend. East West Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $70.6M, which are smaller than East West Bancorp quarterly revenues of $683.3M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $16.4M is lower than East West Bancorp's net income of $290.3M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while East West Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.97x versus 5.63x for East West Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peoples Financial Services has a net margin of 23.17% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 33.26%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 9.42% beat Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 4.76%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.78%. On the other hand Peoples Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.59%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Metropolitan Bank Holding, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Metropolitan Bank Holding.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.324% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.753, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.669%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Peoples Financial Services offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Peoples Financial Services pays out 212.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $70.6M, which are larger than Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues of $45.1M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $16.4M is higher than Peoples Financial Services's net income of $15M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while Peoples Financial Services's PE ratio is 24.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.97x versus 3.07x for Peoples Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 23.17% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 24.09%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 9.42% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.78%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Metropolitan Bank Holding, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Metropolitan Bank Holding.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.324% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $70.6M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $16.4M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.97x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial has a net margin of 23.17% compared to Metropolitan Bank Holding's net margin of 15.94%. Metropolitan Bank Holding's return on equity of 9.42% beat UMB Financial's return on equity of 10.24%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a consensus price target of $78.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.78%. On the other hand UMB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $124.64 which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Metropolitan Bank Holding, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Metropolitan Bank Holding.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.324% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.04%.

Metropolitan Bank Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UMB Financial offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Metropolitan Bank Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial pays out 17.48% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Metropolitan Bank Holding quarterly revenues are $70.6M, which are smaller than UMB Financial quarterly revenues of $510.2M. Metropolitan Bank Holding's net income of $16.4M is lower than UMB Financial's net income of $81.3M. Notably, Metropolitan Bank Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.48x while UMB Financial's PE ratio is 13.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Metropolitan Bank Holding is 2.97x versus 3.57x for UMB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.