JLL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Jones Lang LaSalle's net margin of -3.05%. Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.99% beat Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -1.09%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a consensus price target of $295.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.48%. Given that Jones Lang LaSalle has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Jones Lang LaSalle is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.72%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus & Millichap offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Jones Lang LaSalle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out -163.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues of $145M. Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $55.3M is higher than Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Jones Lang LaSalle's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while Marcus & Millichap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jones Lang LaSalle is 0.50x versus 1.69x for Marcus & Millichap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newmark Group has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Jones Lang LaSalle's net margin of -1.32%. Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.99% beat Newmark Group's return on equity of 4.51%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a consensus price target of $295.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand Newmark Group has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 21.03%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newmark Group has a beta of 1.935, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.476%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Newmark Group offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Jones Lang LaSalle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group pays out 33.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Newmark Group quarterly revenues of $665.5M. Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $55.3M is higher than Newmark Group's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Jones Lang LaSalle's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while Newmark Group's PE ratio is 31.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jones Lang LaSalle is 0.50x versus 0.92x for Newmark Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Real Brokerage has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Jones Lang LaSalle's net margin of -1.4%. Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.99% beat The Real Brokerage's return on equity of -51%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a consensus price target of $295.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand The Real Brokerage has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 59.13%. Given that The Real Brokerage has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, analysts believe The Real Brokerage is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Real Brokerage has a beta of 1.509, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.925%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Real Brokerage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jones Lang LaSalle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Real Brokerage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than The Real Brokerage quarterly revenues of $354M. Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $55.3M is higher than The Real Brokerage's net income of -$5M. Notably, Jones Lang LaSalle's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while The Real Brokerage's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jones Lang LaSalle is 0.50x versus 0.55x for The Real Brokerage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of 0.96% compared to Jones Lang LaSalle's net margin of 29.05%. Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.99% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -20.65%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a consensus price target of $295.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.78%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 53.69%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.336, which suggesting that the stock is 33.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.038%.

Jones Lang LaSalle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 18.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Jones Lang LaSalle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out -52.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $55.3M is higher than Sachem Capital's net income of $904K. Notably, Jones Lang LaSalle's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 40.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jones Lang LaSalle is 0.50x versus 17.85x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.