HUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Balchem has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Huntsman's net margin of 14.79%. Huntsman's return on equity of -4.78% beat Balchem's return on equity of 11.92%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand Balchem has an analysts' consensus of $196.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.94%. Given that Balchem has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Balchem is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Balchem has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.888%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.85%. Balchem offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Balchem pays out 19.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Balchem's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Balchem quarterly revenues of $250.5M. Huntsman's net income of -$5M is lower than Balchem's net income of $37.1M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Balchem's PE ratio is 37.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.33x versus 5.37x for Balchem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Chemours has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -0.29%. Huntsman's return on equity of -4.78% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 4.67%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $15.11 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Huntsman has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Huntsman is more attractive than The Chemours.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.652, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.152%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.85%. The Chemours offers a yield of 6.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Huntsman's net income of -$5M is lower than The Chemours's net income of -$4M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chemours's PE ratio is 69.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.33x versus 0.34x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Huntsman's net margin of --. Huntsman's return on equity of -4.78% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.85%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Huntsman's net income of -$5M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.33x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -0.36% compared to Huntsman's net margin of --. Huntsman's return on equity of -4.78% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $13.12, signalling upside risk potential of 16.07%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.706, which suggesting that the stock is 29.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.85%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Huntsman's net income of -$5M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.33x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.