HUBB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 12.43% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 5.45%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.32% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $427.54, signalling downside risk potential of -2.22%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $260.68 which suggests that it could grow by 2.09%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.310, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.954%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Hubbell's net income of $169.7M is higher than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.58x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 18.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 0.88x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of 12.43% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 1.02%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.32% beat Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 3.31%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $427.54, signalling downside risk potential of -2.22%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could grow by 2.02%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.2%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Kimball Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues of $374.6M. Hubbell's net income of $169.7M is higher than Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.58x while Kimball Electronics's PE ratio is 27.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 0.32x for Kimball Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of 12.43% compared to Hubbell's net margin of --. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.32% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $427.54, signalling downside risk potential of -2.22%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.76%. Given that Orbit International has higher upside potential than Hubbell, analysts believe Orbit International is more attractive than Hubbell.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.148, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.237%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Orbit International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. Hubbell's net income of $169.7M is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.58x while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 0.70x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries has a net margin of 12.43% compared to Hubbell's net margin of -1.3%. Hubbell's return on equity of 25.32% beat RF Industries's return on equity of -4.19%.

Hubbell has a consensus price target of $427.54, signalling downside risk potential of -2.22%. On the other hand RF Industries has an analysts' consensus of $6.25 which suggests that it could fall by -6.99%. Given that RF Industries has more downside risk than Hubbell, analysts believe Hubbell is more attractive than RF Industries.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.989, which suggesting that the stock is 1.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.181%.

Hubbell has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. RF Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hubbell pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hubbell quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than RF Industries quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Hubbell's net income of $169.7M is higher than RF Industries's net income of -$245K. Notably, Hubbell's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.58x while RF Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hubbell is 4.22x versus 0.97x for RF Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.