HLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyatt Hotels has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 1.16%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hyatt Hotels's return on equity of 21.12%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $257.32, signalling downside risk potential of -5.91%. On the other hand Hyatt Hotels has an analysts' consensus of $153.56 which suggests that it could grow by 4.56%. Given that Hyatt Hotels has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Hyatt Hotels is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyatt Hotels has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.058%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Hyatt Hotels offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyatt Hotels pays out 4.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Hyatt Hotels quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is higher than Hyatt Hotels's net income of $20M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Hyatt Hotels's PE ratio is 19.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.99x versus 2.22x for Hyatt Hotels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hilton Grand Vacations has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of -1.48%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hilton Grand Vacations's return on equity of 1.73%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $257.32, signalling downside risk potential of -5.91%. On the other hand Hilton Grand Vacations has an analysts' consensus of $49.17 which suggests that it could grow by 4.08%. Given that Hilton Grand Vacations has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Hilton Grand Vacations is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilton Grand Vacations has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.513%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Hilton Grand Vacations offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Grand Vacations pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Hilton Grand Vacations quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is higher than Hilton Grand Vacations's net income of -$17M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Hilton Grand Vacations's PE ratio is 147.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.99x versus 0.95x for Hilton Grand Vacations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott International has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 10.62%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Marriott International's return on equity of --.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $257.32, signalling downside risk potential of -5.91%. On the other hand Marriott International has an analysts' consensus of $278.24 which suggests that it could grow by 1.7%. Given that Marriott International has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Marriott International is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott International has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.04%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Marriott International offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott International pays out 28.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Marriott International quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is lower than Marriott International's net income of $665M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Marriott International's PE ratio is 31.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.99x versus 3.04x for Marriott International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 11.13% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net margin of 19.3%. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Wyndham Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 53.72%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a consensus price target of $257.32, signalling downside risk potential of -5.91%. On the other hand Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $104.20 which suggests that it could grow by 20.34%. Given that Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has higher upside potential than Hilton Worldwide Holdings, analysts believe Wyndham Hotels & Resorts is more attractive than Hilton Worldwide Holdings.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wyndham Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.944%.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Hilton Worldwide Holdings pays 9.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts pays out 42.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hilton Worldwide Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Wyndham Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $316M. Hilton Worldwide Holdings's net income of $300M is higher than Wyndham Hotels & Resorts's net income of $61M. Notably, Hilton Worldwide Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Wyndham Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 20.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hilton Worldwide Holdings is 5.99x versus 4.84x for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.