GNL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

New Concept Energy has a net margin of -143.02% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of -52.63%. Global Net Lease's return on equity of -13.12% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.88%.

Global Net Lease has a consensus price target of $9.42, signalling upside risk potential of 31.33%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Net Lease has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe Global Net Lease is more attractive than New Concept Energy.

Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.81%.

Global Net Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.97%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Net Lease pays -240.31% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Net Lease quarterly revenues are $132.4M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $38K. Global Net Lease's net income of -$189.4M is lower than New Concept Energy's net income of -$20K. Notably, Global Net Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease is 2.26x versus 33.29x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a net margin of -143.02% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of -5.49%. Global Net Lease's return on equity of -13.12% beat InnSuites Hospitality Trust's return on equity of -89.93%.

Global Net Lease has a consensus price target of $9.42, signalling upside risk potential of 31.33%. On the other hand InnSuites Hospitality Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Net Lease has higher upside potential than InnSuites Hospitality Trust, analysts believe Global Net Lease is more attractive than InnSuites Hospitality Trust.

Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InnSuites Hospitality Trust has a beta of 0.086, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.441%.

Global Net Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.97%. InnSuites Hospitality Trust offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Global Net Lease pays -240.31% of its earnings as a dividend. InnSuites Hospitality Trust pays out -12.79% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Net Lease quarterly revenues are $132.4M, which are larger than InnSuites Hospitality Trust quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Global Net Lease's net income of -$189.4M is lower than InnSuites Hospitality Trust's net income of -$121K. Notably, Global Net Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InnSuites Hospitality Trust's PE ratio is 43.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease is 2.26x versus 2.53x for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LTC Properties has a net margin of -143.02% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of 42.18%. Global Net Lease's return on equity of -13.12% beat LTC Properties's return on equity of 8.67%.

Global Net Lease has a consensus price target of $9.42, signalling upside risk potential of 31.33%. On the other hand LTC Properties has an analysts' consensus of $36.83 which suggests that it could grow by 5.69%. Given that Global Net Lease has higher upside potential than LTC Properties, analysts believe Global Net Lease is more attractive than LTC Properties.

Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LTC Properties has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.215%.

Global Net Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.97%. LTC Properties offers a yield of 6.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Global Net Lease pays -240.31% of its earnings as a dividend. LTC Properties pays out 110.42% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Net Lease quarterly revenues are $132.4M, which are larger than LTC Properties quarterly revenues of $49M. Global Net Lease's net income of -$189.4M is lower than LTC Properties's net income of $20.7M. Notably, Global Net Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LTC Properties's PE ratio is 17.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease is 2.26x versus 7.51x for LTC Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMH Properties has a net margin of -143.02% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of 7.94%. Global Net Lease's return on equity of -13.12% beat UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.38%.

Global Net Lease has a consensus price target of $9.42, signalling upside risk potential of 31.33%. On the other hand UMH Properties has an analysts' consensus of $21.21 which suggests that it could grow by 25.45%. Given that Global Net Lease has higher upside potential than UMH Properties, analysts believe Global Net Lease is more attractive than UMH Properties.

Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.432% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMH Properties has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.143%.

Global Net Lease has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.97%. UMH Properties offers a yield of 5.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Global Net Lease pays -240.31% of its earnings as a dividend. UMH Properties pays out 361.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Net Lease quarterly revenues are $132.4M, which are larger than UMH Properties quarterly revenues of $61.2M. Global Net Lease's net income of -$189.4M is lower than UMH Properties's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Global Net Lease's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UMH Properties's PE ratio is 140.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Net Lease is 2.26x versus 5.41x for UMH Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.