GFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of 37.15% beat Deep Green Waste & Recycling's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $56.02, signalling upside risk potential of 18.23%. On the other hand Deep Green Waste & Recycling has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Deep Green Waste & Recycling, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Deep Green Waste & Recycling.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deep Green Waste & Recycling has a beta of 0.892, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.83%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Deep Green Waste & Recycling offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Deep Green Waste & Recycling pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Deep Green Waste & Recycling quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $2.4B is higher than Deep Green Waste & Recycling's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Deep Green Waste & Recycling's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.34x versus 0.04x for Deep Green Waste & Recycling. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy And Water Development has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of 37.15% beat Energy And Water Development's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $56.02, signalling upside risk potential of 18.23%. On the other hand Energy And Water Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Energy And Water Development, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Energy And Water Development.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy And Water Development has a beta of -505.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50667.304%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Energy And Water Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy And Water Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Energy And Water Development quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $2.4B is higher than Energy And Water Development's net income of -$840.7K. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Energy And Water Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.34x versus -- for Energy And Water Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LifeQuest World has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of 37.15% beat LifeQuest World's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $56.02, signalling upside risk potential of 18.23%. On the other hand LifeQuest World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than LifeQuest World.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World has a beta of -0.048, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.805%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. LifeQuest World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than LifeQuest World quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $2.4B is higher than LifeQuest World's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while LifeQuest World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.34x versus -- for LifeQuest World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rain Oncology has a net margin of -9.52% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of --. GFL Environmental's return on equity of 37.15% beat Rain Oncology's return on equity of --.

GFL Environmental has a consensus price target of $56.02, signalling upside risk potential of 18.23%. On the other hand Rain Oncology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than Rain Oncology, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than Rain Oncology.

GFL Environmental has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.872% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rain Oncology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GFL Environmental has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Rain Oncology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GFL Environmental pays -3.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Rain Oncology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GFL Environmental quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Rain Oncology quarterly revenues of --. GFL Environmental's net income of $2.4B is higher than Rain Oncology's net income of --. Notably, GFL Environmental's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Rain Oncology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GFL Environmental is 3.34x versus -- for Rain Oncology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.