FUL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flamemaster has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat Flamemaster's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 10.1%. On the other hand Flamemaster has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Flamemaster, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Flamemaster.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flamemaster has a beta of -0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.073%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Flamemaster offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Flamemaster pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are larger than Flamemaster quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is higher than Flamemaster's net income of --. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.50x while Flamemaster's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.96x versus -- for Flamemaster. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPG Industries has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 10.13%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat PPG Industries's return on equity of 14.29%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 10.1%. On the other hand PPG Industries has an analysts' consensus of $127.54 which suggests that it could grow by 11.36%. Given that PPG Industries has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe PPG Industries is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPG Industries has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.015%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. PPG Industries offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. PPG Industries pays out 55.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are smaller than PPG Industries quarterly revenues of $3.7B. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is lower than PPG Industries's net income of $373M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.50x while PPG Industries's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.96x versus 1.75x for PPG Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perimeter Solutions has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 78.7%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat Perimeter Solutions's return on equity of 12.12%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 10.1%. On the other hand Perimeter Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.44%. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Perimeter Solutions, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Perimeter Solutions.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perimeter Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Perimeter Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Perimeter Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are larger than Perimeter Solutions quarterly revenues of $72M. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is lower than Perimeter Solutions's net income of $56.7M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.50x while Perimeter Solutions's PE ratio is 21.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.96x versus 4.49x for Perimeter Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sherwin-Williams has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 9.5%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat Sherwin-Williams's return on equity of 68.4%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 10.1%. On the other hand Sherwin-Williams has an analysts' consensus of $377.02 which suggests that it could grow by 10.86%. Given that Sherwin-Williams has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Sherwin-Williams is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.284%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.5%. Sherwin-Williams offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sherwin-Williams pays out 26.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are smaller than Sherwin-Williams quarterly revenues of $5.3B. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is lower than Sherwin-Williams's net income of $503.9M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.50x while Sherwin-Williams's PE ratio is 32.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.96x versus 3.74x for Sherwin-Williams. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.