FSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 6.46%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 18.57% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $110.08, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $64.30 which suggests that it could grow by 19.54%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.442% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.968%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $463.8M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Federal Signal's net income of $46.3M is lower than Flowserve's net income of $73.9M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.22x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.46x versus 1.54x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 17.71%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 18.57% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 28.27%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $110.08, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $183.10 which suggests that it could fall by -0.65%. Given that Federal Signal has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Federal Signal is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.442% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.002%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $463.8M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Federal Signal's net income of $46.3M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $344M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.22x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 60.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.46x versus 9.99x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of -814.55%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 18.57% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $110.08, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Federal Signal has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Federal Signal is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.442% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.662%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $463.8M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Federal Signal's net income of $46.3M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.22x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.46x versus 9.39x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 9.98% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of -7.32%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 18.57% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08%.

Federal Signal has a consensus price target of $110.08, signalling upside risk potential of 3.39%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 151.12%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Federal Signal, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Federal Signal.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.274, which suggesting that the stock is 27.442% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.0099999999999989%.

Federal Signal has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Federal Signal pays 13.55% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Signal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Federal Signal quarterly revenues are $463.8M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $19M. Federal Signal's net income of $46.3M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Federal Signal's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.22x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Federal Signal is 3.46x versus 0.41x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.