CWT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Water Works has a net margin of 6.54% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of 17.95%. California Water Service Group's return on equity of 8.47% beat American Water Works's return on equity of 10.42%.

California Water Service Group has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.81%. On the other hand American Water Works has an analysts' consensus of $142.58 which suggests that it could grow by 0.61%. Given that California Water Service Group has higher upside potential than American Water Works, analysts believe California Water Service Group is more attractive than American Water Works.

California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Water Works has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.071%.

California Water Service Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. American Water Works offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. California Water Service Group pays 34.31% of its earnings as a dividend. American Water Works pays out 55.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Water Service Group quarterly revenues are $204M, which are smaller than American Water Works quarterly revenues of $1.1B. California Water Service Group's net income of $13.3M is lower than American Water Works's net income of $205M. Notably, California Water Service Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.03x while American Water Works's PE ratio is 25.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Water Service Group is 2.78x versus 5.74x for American Water Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American States Water has a net margin of 6.54% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of 18.14%. California Water Service Group's return on equity of 8.47% beat American States Water's return on equity of 14.01%.

California Water Service Group has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.81%. On the other hand American States Water has an analysts' consensus of $84.33 which suggests that it could grow by 11.17%. Given that California Water Service Group has higher upside potential than American States Water, analysts believe California Water Service Group is more attractive than American States Water.

California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American States Water has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.505%.

California Water Service Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. American States Water offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. California Water Service Group pays 34.31% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water pays out 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Water Service Group quarterly revenues are $204M, which are larger than American States Water quarterly revenues of $148M. California Water Service Group's net income of $13.3M is lower than American States Water's net income of $26.8M. Notably, California Water Service Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.03x while American States Water's PE ratio is 23.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Water Service Group is 2.78x versus 4.73x for American States Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadiz has a net margin of 6.54% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of -324.75%. California Water Service Group's return on equity of 8.47% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -104.01%.

California Water Service Group has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.81%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 325.17%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than California Water Service Group, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than California Water Service Group.

California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 1.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.614%.

California Water Service Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Water Service Group pays 34.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.4% of its earnings as a dividend. California Water Service Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Water Service Group quarterly revenues are $204M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3M. California Water Service Group's net income of $13.3M is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, California Water Service Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.03x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Water Service Group is 2.78x versus 18.35x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Essential Utilities has a net margin of 6.54% compared to California Water Service Group's net margin of 36.22%. California Water Service Group's return on equity of 8.47% beat Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.87%.

California Water Service Group has a consensus price target of $57.00, signalling upside risk potential of 24.81%. On the other hand Essential Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $45.33 which suggests that it could grow by 21.7%. Given that California Water Service Group has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe California Water Service Group is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.641, which suggesting that the stock is 35.851% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.989%.

California Water Service Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Essential Utilities offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. California Water Service Group pays 34.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Utilities pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Water Service Group quarterly revenues are $204M, which are smaller than Essential Utilities quarterly revenues of $783.6M. California Water Service Group's net income of $13.3M is lower than Essential Utilities's net income of $283.8M. Notably, California Water Service Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.03x while Essential Utilities's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Water Service Group is 2.78x versus 4.54x for Essential Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.