CW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadre Holdings has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 7.11%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat Cadre Holdings's return on equity of 12.82%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $447.39, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand Cadre Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $42.67 which suggests that it could grow by 32.42%. Given that Cadre Holdings has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Cadre Holdings is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadre Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Cadre Holdings offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadre Holdings pays out 38.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are larger than Cadre Holdings quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is higher than Cadre Holdings's net income of $9.2M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.86x while Cadre Holdings's PE ratio is 33.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.73x versus 2.36x for Cadre Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 5.72%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.71%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $447.39, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.43%. Given that Sturm Ruger & has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Sturm Ruger & is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.096, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.395%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $135.7M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $7.8M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.86x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 19.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.73x versus 1.14x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VSE has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of -3.51%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat VSE's return on equity of 1.56%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $447.39, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand VSE has an analysts' consensus of $148.75 which suggests that it could grow by 15.33%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VSE has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.641%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. VSE offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE pays out 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are larger than VSE quarterly revenues of $256M. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is higher than VSE's net income of -$9M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.86x while VSE's PE ratio is 164.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.73x versus 2.26x for VSE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 12.58% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 0.8%. Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42% beat V2X's return on equity of 4.12%.

Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $447.39, signalling downside risk potential of -7.14%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $62.50 which suggests that it could grow by 33.8%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.154, which suggesting that the stock is 15.382% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.237, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.313%.

Curtiss-Wright has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Curtiss-Wright pays 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues are $805.6M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1B. Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M is higher than V2X's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Curtiss-Wright's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.86x while V2X's PE ratio is 36.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Curtiss-Wright is 5.73x versus 0.34x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.