CAVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Cava Group's net margin of 8.36%. Cava Group's return on equity of 22.09% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Cava Group has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $169.95 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that Cava Group has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Cava Group is more attractive than Brinker International.

Cava Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.698, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.785%.

Cava Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cava Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cava Group quarterly revenues are $331.8M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Cava Group's net income of $25.7M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Cava Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.15x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cava Group is 10.17x versus 1.50x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Cava Group's net margin of -15.06%. Cava Group's return on equity of 22.09% beat Sweetgreen's return on equity of -19.57%.

Cava Group has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand Sweetgreen has an analysts' consensus of $21.33 which suggests that it could grow by 63.22%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Cava Group, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Cava Group.

Cava Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cava Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweetgreen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cava Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cava Group quarterly revenues are $331.8M, which are larger than Sweetgreen quarterly revenues of $166.3M. Cava Group's net income of $25.7M is higher than Sweetgreen's net income of -$25M. Notably, Cava Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.15x while Sweetgreen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cava Group is 10.17x versus 2.20x for Sweetgreen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shake Shack has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Cava Group's net margin of 1.32%. Cava Group's return on equity of 22.09% beat Shake Shack's return on equity of 2.56%.

Cava Group has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand Shake Shack has an analysts' consensus of $127.29 which suggests that it could fall by -7.01%. Given that Cava Group has higher upside potential than Shake Shack, analysts believe Cava Group is more attractive than Shake Shack.

Cava Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shake Shack has a beta of 1.771, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.067%.

Cava Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shake Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cava Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shake Shack pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cava Group quarterly revenues are $331.8M, which are larger than Shake Shack quarterly revenues of $320.9M. Cava Group's net income of $25.7M is higher than Shake Shack's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Cava Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.15x while Shake Shack's PE ratio is 488.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cava Group is 10.17x versus 4.47x for Shake Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 7.75% compared to Cava Group's net margin of 14.16%. Cava Group's return on equity of 22.09% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Cava Group has a consensus price target of $110.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $159.39 which suggests that it could grow by 9.07%. Given that Cava Group has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Cava Group is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Cava Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.237%.

Cava Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Cava Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cava Group quarterly revenues are $331.8M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Cava Group's net income of $25.7M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $253M. Notably, Cava Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 74.15x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 29.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cava Group is 10.17x versus 5.37x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.