BV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cass Information Systems has a net margin of 0.97% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of 18.95%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat Cass Information Systems's return on equity of 9.04%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Cass Information Systems has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that BrightView Holdings has higher upside potential than Cass Information Systems, analysts believe BrightView Holdings is more attractive than Cass Information Systems.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems has a beta of 0.446, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.44%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cass Information Systems offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems pays out 85.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.6M, which are larger than Cass Information Systems quarterly revenues of $47.3M. BrightView Holdings's net income of $6.4M is lower than Cass Information Systems's net income of $9M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.78x while Cass Information Systems's PE ratio is 29.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.56x versus 3.28x for Cass Information Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cintas has a net margin of 0.97% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of 17.76%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat Cintas's return on equity of 41.44%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Cintas has an analysts' consensus of $217.69 which suggests that it could fall by -1.91%. Given that BrightView Holdings has higher upside potential than Cintas, analysts believe BrightView Holdings is more attractive than Cintas.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cintas has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.028%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cintas offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Cintas pays out 33.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.6M, which are smaller than Cintas quarterly revenues of $2.6B. BrightView Holdings's net income of $6.4M is lower than Cintas's net income of $463.5M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.78x while Cintas's PE ratio is 51.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.56x versus 9.00x for Cintas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resources Connection has a net margin of 0.97% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of -34.03%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat Resources Connection's return on equity of -29.28%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand Resources Connection has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 83.43%. Given that Resources Connection has higher upside potential than BrightView Holdings, analysts believe Resources Connection is more attractive than BrightView Holdings.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Connection has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.856%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Connection offers a yield of 9.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Connection pays out 89.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.6M, which are larger than Resources Connection quarterly revenues of $129.4M. BrightView Holdings's net income of $6.4M is higher than Resources Connection's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.78x while Resources Connection's PE ratio is 24.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.56x versus 0.31x for Resources Connection. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPAR Group has a net margin of 0.97% compared to BrightView Holdings's net margin of -0.38%. BrightView Holdings's return on equity of 2.55% beat SPAR Group's return on equity of 33.96%.

BrightView Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.39%. On the other hand SPAR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 644.84%. Given that SPAR Group has higher upside potential than BrightView Holdings, analysts believe SPAR Group is more attractive than BrightView Holdings.

BrightView Holdings has a beta of 1.272, which suggesting that the stock is 27.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPAR Group has a beta of 0.344, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.593%.

BrightView Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPAR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BrightView Holdings pays 26.81% of its earnings as a dividend. SPAR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrightView Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BrightView Holdings quarterly revenues are $662.6M, which are larger than SPAR Group quarterly revenues of $37.8M. BrightView Holdings's net income of $6.4M is higher than SPAR Group's net income of -$144K. Notably, BrightView Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.78x while SPAR Group's PE ratio is 2.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BrightView Holdings is 0.56x versus 0.11x for SPAR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.