BC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Brunswick's net margin of 5.64%. Brunswick's return on equity of 4.17% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -1.7%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $60.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.93%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $36.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that Malibu Boats has higher upside potential than Brunswick, analysts believe Malibu Boats is more attractive than Brunswick.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.07%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $228.7M. Brunswick's net income of $20.2M is higher than Malibu Boats's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.22x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.77x versus 0.86x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Brunswick's net margin of 4.93%. Brunswick's return on equity of 4.17% beat MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -3.65%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $60.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.93%. On the other hand MasterCraft Boat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.50 which suggests that it could fall by -2.24%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than MasterCraft Boat Holdings, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than MasterCraft Boat Holdings.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.006%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues of $76M. Brunswick's net income of $20.2M is higher than MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.22x while MasterCraft Boat Holdings's PE ratio is 42.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.77x versus 1.05x for MasterCraft Boat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Products has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Brunswick's net margin of 3.74%. Brunswick's return on equity of 4.17% beat Marine Products's return on equity of 11.63%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $60.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.93%. On the other hand Marine Products has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.77%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than Marine Products.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Products has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.198%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Marine Products offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products pays out 244.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Products's is not.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Marine Products quarterly revenues of $59M. Brunswick's net income of $20.2M is higher than Marine Products's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.22x while Marine Products's PE ratio is 20.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.77x versus 1.27x for Marine Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Lighting Group has a net margin of 1.65% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -223.31%. Brunswick's return on equity of 4.17% beat US Lighting Group's return on equity of --.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $60.65, signalling upside risk potential of 3.93%. On the other hand US Lighting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than US Lighting Group, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than US Lighting Group.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.275, which suggesting that the stock is 27.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Lighting Group has a beta of 2.372, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.193%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. US Lighting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. US Lighting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than US Lighting Group quarterly revenues of $151.8K. Brunswick's net income of $20.2M is higher than US Lighting Group's net income of -$339K. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.22x while US Lighting Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.77x versus 0.40x for US Lighting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.