OGEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cellectar Biosciences has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of --. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat Cellectar Biosciences's return on equity of --.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2012.89%. On the other hand Cellectar Biosciences has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2280.96%. Given that Cellectar Biosciences has higher upside potential than Oragenics, analysts believe Cellectar Biosciences is more attractive than Oragenics.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cellectar Biosciences has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.315%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cellectar Biosciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cellectar Biosciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cellectar Biosciences quarterly revenues of --. Oragenics's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Cellectar Biosciences's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cellectar Biosciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 0.45x versus 137.94x for Cellectar Biosciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of -49.65%. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2012.89%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 31.62%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.681%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Oragenics's net income of -$2.2M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 0.45x versus 0.16x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nanoviricides has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of --. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat Nanoviricides's return on equity of --.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2012.89%. On the other hand Nanoviricides has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 306.25%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Nanoviricides, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Nanoviricides.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nanoviricides has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.802%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nanoviricides offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nanoviricides pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nanoviricides quarterly revenues of --. Oragenics's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Nanoviricides's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nanoviricides's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 0.45x versus -- for Nanoviricides. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -- compared to Oragenics's net margin of --. Oragenics's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Oragenics has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2012.89%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1402.15%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Theriva Biologics, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Theriva Biologics.

Oragenics has a beta of 0.946, which suggesting that the stock is 5.446% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.373%.

Oragenics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oragenics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oragenics quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Oragenics's net income of -$2.2M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Oragenics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oragenics is 0.45x versus 0.33x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.