WSFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Old National Bancorp has a net margin of 25.73% compared to WSFS Financial's net margin of 30.05%. WSFS Financial's return on equity of 10.26% beat Old National Bancorp's return on equity of 9.12%.

WSFS Financial has a consensus price target of $62.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand Old National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $26.14 which suggests that it could grow by 14.78%. Given that Old National Bancorp has higher upside potential than WSFS Financial, analysts believe Old National Bancorp is more attractive than WSFS Financial.

WSFS Financial has a beta of 0.869, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old National Bancorp has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.55%.

WSFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Old National Bancorp offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. WSFS Financial pays 13.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Old National Bancorp pays out 35.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WSFS Financial quarterly revenues are $256.1M, which are smaller than Old National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $481.4M. WSFS Financial's net income of $65.9M is lower than Old National Bancorp's net income of $144.7M. Notably, WSFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Old National Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WSFS Financial is 3.25x versus 3.75x for Old National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Provident Financial Services has a net margin of 25.73% compared to WSFS Financial's net margin of 30.67%. WSFS Financial's return on equity of 10.26% beat Provident Financial Services's return on equity of 5.48%.

WSFS Financial has a consensus price target of $62.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand Provident Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $20.92 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Provident Financial Services has higher upside potential than WSFS Financial, analysts believe Provident Financial Services is more attractive than WSFS Financial.

WSFS Financial has a beta of 0.869, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Provident Financial Services has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.109%.

WSFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Provident Financial Services offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. WSFS Financial pays 13.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Provident Financial Services pays out 87.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WSFS Financial quarterly revenues are $256.1M, which are larger than Provident Financial Services quarterly revenues of $208.8M. WSFS Financial's net income of $65.9M is higher than Provident Financial Services's net income of $64M. Notably, WSFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Provident Financial Services's PE ratio is 15.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WSFS Financial is 3.25x versus 2.92x for Provident Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riverview Bancorp has a net margin of 25.73% compared to WSFS Financial's net margin of 8.9%. WSFS Financial's return on equity of 10.26% beat Riverview Bancorp's return on equity of 3.1%.

WSFS Financial has a consensus price target of $62.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand Riverview Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.97%. Given that Riverview Bancorp has higher upside potential than WSFS Financial, analysts believe Riverview Bancorp is more attractive than WSFS Financial.

WSFS Financial has a beta of 0.869, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riverview Bancorp has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.258%.

WSFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Riverview Bancorp offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. WSFS Financial pays 13.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Riverview Bancorp pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WSFS Financial quarterly revenues are $256.1M, which are larger than Riverview Bancorp quarterly revenues of $12.9M. WSFS Financial's net income of $65.9M is higher than Riverview Bancorp's net income of $1.1M. Notably, WSFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Riverview Bancorp's PE ratio is 23.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WSFS Financial is 3.25x versus 2.28x for Riverview Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Financial has a net margin of 25.73% compared to WSFS Financial's net margin of 0.02%. WSFS Financial's return on equity of 10.26% beat Triumph Financial's return on equity of 1.35%.

WSFS Financial has a consensus price target of $62.00, signalling upside risk potential of 7.66%. On the other hand Triumph Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.50 which suggests that it could fall by -4.84%. Given that WSFS Financial has higher upside potential than Triumph Financial, analysts believe WSFS Financial is more attractive than Triumph Financial.

WSFS Financial has a beta of 0.869, which suggesting that the stock is 13.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Financial has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.923%.

WSFS Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Triumph Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WSFS Financial pays 13.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Financial pays out 19.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WSFS Financial quarterly revenues are $256.1M, which are larger than Triumph Financial quarterly revenues of $101.4M. WSFS Financial's net income of $65.9M is higher than Triumph Financial's net income of $17K. Notably, WSFS Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Triumph Financial's PE ratio is 171.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WSFS Financial is 3.25x versus 3.62x for Triumph Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.