TRMK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Park National has a net margin of 31.98% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 32.4%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $42.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 0.23%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Park National.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Park National offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is higher than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.93x versus 5.29x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 31.98% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 27.47%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $42.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $25.48 which suggests that it could grow by 3.95%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.134%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $490M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 11.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.93x versus 3.15x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simmons First National has a net margin of 31.98% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 15.68%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Simmons First National's return on equity of 4.18%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $42.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand Simmons First National has an analysts' consensus of $21.60 which suggests that it could grow by 9.7%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Simmons First National, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Simmons First National.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simmons First National has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.778%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Simmons First National offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Simmons First National pays out 69.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are smaller than Simmons First National quarterly revenues of $206.5M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is higher than Simmons First National's net income of $32.4M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while Simmons First National's PE ratio is 16.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.93x versus 3.20x for Simmons First National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 31.98% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 24.09%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $42.70, signalling upside risk potential of 11.49%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.63% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $167.7M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.93x versus 3.08x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.