THRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Groupon has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of 6.12%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -55.26% beat Groupon's return on equity of -94.8%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 82.31%. On the other hand Groupon has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.57%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Groupon, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Groupon.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.398% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Groupon has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.598%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Groupon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Groupon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are larger than Groupon quarterly revenues of $117.2M. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$9.6M is lower than Groupon's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Groupon's PE ratio is 14.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.61x versus 2.80x for Groupon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of 39.34%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -55.26% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 39.74%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 82.31%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $741.98 which suggests that it could grow by 5.56%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.398% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.504%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $42.3B. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$9.6M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $16.6B. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 27.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.61x versus 10.74x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

comScore has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of -4.66%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -55.26% beat comScore's return on equity of -434.38%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 82.31%. On the other hand comScore has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than comScore, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than comScore.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.398% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison comScore has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.352%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. comScore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. comScore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are larger than comScore quarterly revenues of $85.7M. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$9.6M is lower than comScore's net income of -$4M. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while comScore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.61x versus 0.07x for comScore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zedge has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Thryv Holdings's net margin of 2.39%. Thryv Holdings's return on equity of -55.26% beat Zedge's return on equity of -6.29%.

Thryv Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.75, signalling upside risk potential of 82.31%. On the other hand Zedge has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Thryv Holdings has higher upside potential than Zedge, analysts believe Thryv Holdings is more attractive than Zedge.

Thryv Holdings has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.398% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zedge has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.337%.

Thryv Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zedge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thryv Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zedge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thryv Holdings quarterly revenues are $181.4M, which are larger than Zedge quarterly revenues of $7.8M. Thryv Holdings's net income of -$9.6M is lower than Zedge's net income of $185K. Notably, Thryv Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zedge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thryv Holdings is 0.61x versus 2.07x for Zedge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.