SHIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dycom Industries has a net margin of -8% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 4.85%. Shimmick's return on equity of -827.87% beat Dycom Industries's return on equity of 19.4%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.15%. On the other hand Dycom Industries has an analysts' consensus of $272.56 which suggests that it could grow by 6.32%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than Dycom Industries, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than Dycom Industries.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dycom Industries has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.978%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dycom Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dycom Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $122.1M, which are smaller than Dycom Industries quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Shimmick's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Dycom Industries's net income of $61M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dycom Industries's PE ratio is 32.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.15x versus 1.56x for Dycom Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Services of America has a net margin of -8% compared to Shimmick's net margin of -8.87%. Shimmick's return on equity of -827.87% beat Energy Services of America's return on equity of 35.04%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.15%. On the other hand Energy Services of America has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 102.43%. Given that Energy Services of America has higher upside potential than Shimmick, analysts believe Energy Services of America is more attractive than Shimmick.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Services of America has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.39%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Services of America offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America pays out 3.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Services of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $122.1M, which are larger than Energy Services of America quarterly revenues of $76.7M. Shimmick's net income of -$9.8M is lower than Energy Services of America's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Services of America's PE ratio is 8.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.15x versus 0.45x for Energy Services of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasTec has a net margin of -8% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 0.35%. Shimmick's return on equity of -827.87% beat MasTec's return on equity of 7.53%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.15%. On the other hand MasTec has an analysts' consensus of $179.48 which suggests that it could grow by 1.65%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than MasTec, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than MasTec.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasTec has a beta of 1.749, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.884%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasTec offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasTec pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $122.1M, which are smaller than MasTec quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Shimmick's net income of -$9.8M is lower than MasTec's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MasTec's PE ratio is 64.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.15x versus 1.12x for MasTec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MYR Group has a net margin of -8% compared to Shimmick's net margin of 2.8%. Shimmick's return on equity of -827.87% beat MYR Group's return on equity of 5.71%.

Shimmick has a consensus price target of $2.75, signalling upside risk potential of 21.15%. On the other hand MYR Group has an analysts' consensus of $194.2500 which suggests that it could grow by 1.16%. Given that Shimmick has higher upside potential than MYR Group, analysts believe Shimmick is more attractive than MYR Group.

Shimmick has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MYR Group has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.821%.

Shimmick has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MYR Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimmick pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MYR Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shimmick quarterly revenues are $122.1M, which are smaller than MYR Group quarterly revenues of $833.6M. Shimmick's net income of -$9.8M is lower than MYR Group's net income of $23.3M. Notably, Shimmick's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MYR Group's PE ratio is 88.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimmick is 0.15x versus 0.93x for MYR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.