SGBX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Griffon has a net margin of -484.97% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of 9.28%. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Griffon's return on equity of 105.75%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29196.88%. On the other hand Griffon has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 26.44%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Griffon, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Griffon.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.31%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Griffon offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $566.4K, which are smaller than Griffon quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$2.7M is lower than Griffon's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Griffon's PE ratio is 15.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.52x versus 1.44x for Griffon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Janus International Group has a net margin of -484.97% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of 5.13%. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Janus International Group's return on equity of 9.48%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29196.88%. On the other hand Janus International Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.32%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Janus International Group, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Janus International Group.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus International Group has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.892%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Janus International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $566.4K, which are smaller than Janus International Group quarterly revenues of $210.5M. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$2.7M is lower than Janus International Group's net income of $10.8M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Janus International Group's PE ratio is 24.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.52x versus 1.36x for Janus International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of -484.97% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of 4.53%. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 2.06%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29196.88%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $33.75 which suggests that it could grow by 82.33%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Quanex Building Products, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Quanex Building Products.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.078%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $566.4K, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$2.7M is lower than Quanex Building Products's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 31.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.52x versus 0.50x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of -484.97% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of -18.28%. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29196.88%. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Techprecision.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.41% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.767%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $566.4K, which are smaller than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$2.7M is lower than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.52x versus 0.96x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.