SEZL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Credit Acceptance has a net margin of 34.47% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 18.91%. Sezzle's return on equity of 150.41% beat Credit Acceptance's return on equity of 17.43%.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $161.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Credit Acceptance has an analysts' consensus of $495.25 which suggests that it could fall by -1.17%. Given that Sezzle has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance, analysts believe Sezzle is more attractive than Credit Acceptance.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.829%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Credit Acceptance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Credit Acceptance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are smaller than Credit Acceptance quarterly revenues of $562.3M. Sezzle's net income of $36.2M is lower than Credit Acceptance's net income of $106.3M. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.03x while Credit Acceptance's PE ratio is 21.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 15.89x versus 2.82x for Credit Acceptance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Consumer Portfolio Services has a net margin of 34.47% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 9.04%. Sezzle's return on equity of 150.41% beat Consumer Portfolio Services's return on equity of 6.72%.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $161.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Consumer Portfolio Services has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.4%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services has higher upside potential than Sezzle, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services is more attractive than Sezzle.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consumer Portfolio Services has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.886%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consumer Portfolio Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consumer Portfolio Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are larger than Consumer Portfolio Services quarterly revenues of $52M. Sezzle's net income of $36.2M is higher than Consumer Portfolio Services's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.03x while Consumer Portfolio Services's PE ratio is 11.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 15.89x versus 1.12x for Consumer Portfolio Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IF Bancorp has a net margin of 34.47% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 15.8%. Sezzle's return on equity of 150.41% beat IF Bancorp's return on equity of 4.34%.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $161.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand IF Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sezzle has higher upside potential than IF Bancorp, analysts believe Sezzle is more attractive than IF Bancorp.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IF Bancorp has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.385%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IF Bancorp offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp pays out 71.45% of its earnings as a dividend. IF Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are larger than IF Bancorp quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Sezzle's net income of $36.2M is higher than IF Bancorp's net income of $1M. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.03x while IF Bancorp's PE ratio is 23.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 15.89x versus 3.11x for IF Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Card Group has a net margin of 34.47% compared to Sezzle's net margin of 3.89%. Sezzle's return on equity of 150.41% beat CPI Card Group's return on equity of --.

Sezzle has a consensus price target of $161.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand CPI Card Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.75 which suggests that it could grow by 68.66%. Given that CPI Card Group has higher upside potential than Sezzle, analysts believe CPI Card Group is more attractive than Sezzle.

Sezzle has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Card Group has a beta of 1.297, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.746%.

Sezzle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Card Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sezzle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Card Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sezzle quarterly revenues are $104.9M, which are smaller than CPI Card Group quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Sezzle's net income of $36.2M is higher than CPI Card Group's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Sezzle's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.03x while CPI Card Group's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sezzle is 15.89x versus 0.53x for CPI Card Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.