ROKU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Meta Platforms has a net margin of -2.69% compared to Roku's net margin of 39.34%. Roku's return on equity of -4.33% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 39.74%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $90.64, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $741.98 which suggests that it could grow by 5.56%. Given that Meta Platforms has higher upside potential than Roku, analysts believe Meta Platforms is more attractive than Roku.

Roku has a beta of 2.122, which suggesting that the stock is 112.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.504%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $42.3B. Roku's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $16.6B. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 27.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 3.10x versus 10.74x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of -2.69% compared to Roku's net margin of 27.42%. Roku's return on equity of -4.33% beat Netflix's return on equity of 40.31%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $90.64, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,231.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.52%. Given that Netflix has more downside risk than Roku, analysts believe Roku is more attractive than Netflix.

Roku has a beta of 2.122, which suggesting that the stock is 112.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.312%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Roku's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Netflix's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix's PE ratio is 59.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 3.10x versus 13.63x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -2.69% compared to Roku's net margin of 2.11%. Roku's return on equity of -4.33% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $90.64, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -7.63%. Given that Paramount Global has more downside risk than Roku, analysts believe Roku is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Roku has a beta of 2.122, which suggesting that the stock is 112.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.406%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Roku's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 3.10x versus 0.30x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sirius XM Holdings has a net margin of -2.69% compared to Roku's net margin of 9.87%. Roku's return on equity of -4.33% beat Sirius XM Holdings's return on equity of -28.77%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $90.64, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand Sirius XM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.07 which suggests that it could grow by 3.82%. Given that Sirius XM Holdings has higher upside potential than Roku, analysts believe Sirius XM Holdings is more attractive than Roku.

Roku has a beta of 2.122, which suggesting that the stock is 112.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sirius XM Holdings has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.153%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sirius XM Holdings offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sirius XM Holdings pays out -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Sirius XM Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Roku's net income of -$27.4M is lower than Sirius XM Holdings's net income of $204M. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sirius XM Holdings's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 3.10x versus 0.96x for Sirius XM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.