RIVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 1.16%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.7%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.55 which suggests that it could fall by -6.17%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.788%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 6.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.61x versus 0.25x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 6.32%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.33%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.7%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $55.64 which suggests that it could grow by 4.62%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than General Motors.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.192%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $44B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than General Motors's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.61x versus 0.31x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -155.79%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.7%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.52 which suggests that it could grow by 10.18%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.61x versus 6.92x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -43.95% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 2.12%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.83, signalling upside risk potential of 19.7%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.61x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.