PGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cycurion has a net margin of 2.79% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of -264.82%. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -67.28% beat Cycurion's return on equity of -159.42%.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $24.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand Cycurion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than Cycurion, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than Cycurion.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $282.7M, which are larger than Cycurion quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Pagaya Technologies's net income of $7.9M is higher than Cycurion's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycurion's PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 1.66x versus 0.29x for Cycurion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CID Holdco has a net margin of 2.79% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of --. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -67.28% beat CID Holdco's return on equity of --.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $24.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand CID Holdco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than CID Holdco, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than CID Holdco.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CID Holdco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CID Holdco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CID Holdco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $282.7M, which are larger than CID Holdco quarterly revenues of --. Pagaya Technologies's net income of $7.9M is higher than CID Holdco's net income of --. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CID Holdco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 1.66x versus -- for CID Holdco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines has a net margin of 2.79% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of 7.26%. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -67.28% beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67%.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $24.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $269.11 which suggests that it could fall by -4.55%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.643%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $282.7M, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Pagaya Technologies's net income of $7.9M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 48.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 1.66x versus 4.20x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ibotta has a net margin of 2.79% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of 0.66%. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -67.28% beat Ibotta's return on equity of 18.29%.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $24.83, signalling upside risk potential of 5.5%. On the other hand Ibotta has an analysts' consensus of $59.63 which suggests that it could grow by 61.5%. Given that Ibotta has higher upside potential than Pagaya Technologies, analysts believe Ibotta is more attractive than Pagaya Technologies.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibotta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ibotta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ibotta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $282.7M, which are larger than Ibotta quarterly revenues of $84.6M. Pagaya Technologies's net income of $7.9M is higher than Ibotta's net income of $555K. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ibotta's PE ratio is 24.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 1.66x versus 3.08x for Ibotta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.