PCYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz has a net margin of 43.89% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of -324.75%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.35% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -104.01%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.91%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 325.17%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.53% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 1.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.614%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.1M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.3M is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.58x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.99x versus 18.35x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H2O America has a net margin of 43.89% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 9.88%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.35% beat H2O America's return on equity of 7.47%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.91%. On the other hand H2O America has an analysts' consensus of $61.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.34%. Given that H2O America has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe H2O America is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.53% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H2O America has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.248%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H2O America offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H2O America pays out 55.48% of its earnings as a dividend. H2O America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.1M, which are smaller than H2O America quarterly revenues of $167.6M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.3M is lower than H2O America's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.58x while H2O America's PE ratio is 16.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.99x versus 2.19x for H2O America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 43.89% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 21.4%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.35% beat Middlesex Water's return on equity of 9.78%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.91%. On the other hand Middlesex Water has an analysts' consensus of $64.67 which suggests that it could grow by 20.09%. Given that Middlesex Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Middlesex Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.53% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.685%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Middlesex Water offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water pays out 53.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.1M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water quarterly revenues of $44.3M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.3M is lower than Middlesex Water's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.58x while Middlesex Water's PE ratio is 22.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.99x versus 4.94x for Middlesex Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The York Water has a net margin of 43.89% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 19.71%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.35% beat The York Water's return on equity of 8.61%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -35.91%. On the other hand The York Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.83%. Given that The York Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe The York Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.305, which suggesting that the stock is 30.53% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The York Water has a beta of 0.698, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.206%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The York Water offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water pays out 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.1M, which are smaller than The York Water quarterly revenues of $18.5M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.3M is lower than The York Water's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.58x while The York Water's PE ratio is 22.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.99x versus 5.89x for The York Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.