OCSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 99.99%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.08, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.92 which suggests that it could fall by -2.13%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has more downside risk than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.355%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.62%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.38x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 8.48x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 91.13%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.08, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could fall by -0.46%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has more downside risk than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.101%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.62%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.38x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 12.68x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 96.47%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 18.67%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.08, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $26.40 which suggests that it could fall by -8.68%. Given that Gladstone Capital has more downside risk than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.475%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.62%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 6.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than Gladstone Capital's net income of $9M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.38x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 7.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 7.18x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 95.41%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.08, signalling downside risk potential of -3.61%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 3.86%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.686, which suggesting that the stock is 31.445% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.263%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.62%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 112.38x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 10.02x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.