NAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -17.29% compared to Naas Technology's net margin of 4.26%. Naas Technology's return on equity of -7095.33% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32%.

Naas Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65105.58%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 72.02%. Given that Naas Technology has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, analysts believe Naas Technology is more attractive than China Automotive Systems.

Naas Technology has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.28%.

Naas Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Naas Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Naas Technology quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $167.1M. Naas Technology's net income of -$1.1M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Naas Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Naas Technology is 0.05x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of -17.29% compared to Naas Technology's net margin of 16.57%. Naas Technology's return on equity of -7095.33% beat H World Group's return on equity of 27.21%.

Naas Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65105.58%. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $43.70 which suggests that it could grow by 31.18%. Given that Naas Technology has higher upside potential than H World Group, analysts believe Naas Technology is more attractive than H World Group.

Naas Technology has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.484%.

Naas Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group offers a yield of 4.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Naas Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Naas Technology quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are smaller than H World Group quarterly revenues of $741.6M. Naas Technology's net income of -$1.1M is lower than H World Group's net income of $122.9M. Notably, Naas Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H World Group's PE ratio is 23.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Naas Technology is 0.05x versus 3.29x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JX Luxventure Group has a net margin of -17.29% compared to Naas Technology's net margin of --. Naas Technology's return on equity of -7095.33% beat JX Luxventure Group's return on equity of 22.62%.

Naas Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65105.58%. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Naas Technology has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, analysts believe Naas Technology is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group.

Naas Technology has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.206%.

Naas Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Naas Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Naas Technology quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are larger than JX Luxventure Group quarterly revenues of --. Naas Technology's net income of -$1.1M is higher than JX Luxventure Group's net income of --. Notably, Naas Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JX Luxventure Group's PE ratio is 0.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Naas Technology is 0.05x versus 0.04x for JX Luxventure Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of -17.29% compared to Naas Technology's net margin of -13.73%. Naas Technology's return on equity of -7095.33% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

Naas Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65105.58%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 323.73%. Given that Naas Technology has higher upside potential than Kandi Technologies Group, analysts believe Naas Technology is more attractive than Kandi Technologies Group.

Naas Technology has a beta of 0.999, which suggesting that the stock is 0.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.969%.

Naas Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Naas Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Naas Technology quarterly revenues are $6.2M, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Naas Technology's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Naas Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Naas Technology is 0.05x versus 0.75x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.