MWYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Marwynn Holdings's net margin of 2.27%. Marwynn Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of 1.48%.

Marwynn Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings.

Marwynn Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.183%.

Marwynn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Marwynn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marwynn Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Marwynn Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Marwynn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is 63.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings is 2.06x versus 0.49x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Marwynn Holdings's net margin of -3.28%. Marwynn Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.33%.

Marwynn Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.55%. Given that Flexsteel Industries has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, analysts believe Flexsteel Industries is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings.

Marwynn Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.682%.

Marwynn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Marwynn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marwynn Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $114M. Marwynn Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Flexsteel Industries's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Marwynn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings is 2.06x versus 0.49x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterBrand has a net margin of -- compared to Marwynn Holdings's net margin of 2.01%. Marwynn Holdings's return on equity of -- beat MasterBrand's return on equity of 7.97%.

Marwynn Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MasterBrand has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.33%. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings.

Marwynn Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marwynn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasterBrand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marwynn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasterBrand pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marwynn Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MasterBrand quarterly revenues of $660.3M. Marwynn Holdings's net income of -- is lower than MasterBrand's net income of $13.3M. Notably, Marwynn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MasterBrand's PE ratio is 14.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings is 2.06x versus 0.54x for MasterBrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands has a net margin of -- compared to Marwynn Holdings's net margin of --. Marwynn Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Regional Brands's return on equity of --.

Marwynn Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regional Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marwynn Holdings has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, analysts believe Marwynn Holdings is more attractive than Regional Brands.

Marwynn Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands has a beta of -0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.093%.

Marwynn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. Marwynn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marwynn Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Regional Brands quarterly revenues of --. Marwynn Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Regional Brands's net income of --. Notably, Marwynn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regional Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marwynn Holdings is 2.06x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.