MVST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 53.04% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of 11.33%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -22.91% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 17.2%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.87%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of $144.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.31%. Given that Microvast Holdings has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe Microvast Holdings is more attractive than Dorman Products.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.975, which suggesting that the stock is 197.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.269%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $116.5M, which are smaller than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $507.7M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $61.8M is higher than Dorman Products's net income of $57.5M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 17.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.56x versus 1.83x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 53.04% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of -3528.43%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -22.91% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.87%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Microvast Holdings.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.975, which suggesting that the stock is 197.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $116.5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Microvast Holdings's net income of $61.8M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.56x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 53.04% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of -7.21%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -22.91% beat Monro's return on equity of -0.8%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.87%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.38%. Given that Microvast Holdings has higher upside potential than Monro, analysts believe Microvast Holdings is more attractive than Monro.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.975, which suggesting that the stock is 197.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.488%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monro offers a yield of 7.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out -673.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $116.5M, which are smaller than Monro quarterly revenues of $295M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $61.8M is higher than Monro's net income of -$21.3M. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Monro's PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.56x versus 0.38x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 53.04% compared to Microvast Holdings's net margin of -0.37%. Microvast Holdings's return on equity of -22.91% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -7.28%.

Microvast Holdings has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.87%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.77%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Microvast Holdings, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Microvast Holdings.

Microvast Holdings has a beta of 2.975, which suggesting that the stock is 197.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.493%.

Microvast Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microvast Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Microvast Holdings quarterly revenues are $116.5M, which are smaller than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $193.1M. Microvast Holdings's net income of $61.8M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of -$722K. Notably, Microvast Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microvast Holdings is 2.56x versus 0.30x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.