MSBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CB Financial Services has a net margin of 19.49% compared to Midland States Bancorp's net margin of 16.19%. Midland States Bancorp's return on equity of 6.86% beat CB Financial Services's return on equity of 7.07%.

Midland States Bancorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand CB Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $30.67 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that CB Financial Services has higher upside potential than Midland States Bancorp, analysts believe CB Financial Services is more attractive than Midland States Bancorp.

Midland States Bancorp has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.699% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CB Financial Services has a beta of 0.288, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.198%.

Midland States Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.68%. CB Financial Services offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Midland States Bancorp pays 94.59% of its earnings as a dividend. CB Financial Services pays out 40.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Midland States Bancorp quarterly revenues are $75.9M, which are larger than CB Financial Services quarterly revenues of $11.8M. Midland States Bancorp's net income of $14.8M is higher than CB Financial Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Midland States Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while CB Financial Services's PE ratio is 14.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Midland States Bancorp is 1.14x versus 3.06x for CB Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First United has a net margin of 19.49% compared to Midland States Bancorp's net margin of 27.74%. Midland States Bancorp's return on equity of 6.86% beat First United's return on equity of 13.08%.

Midland States Bancorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand First United has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.19%. Given that First United has higher upside potential than Midland States Bancorp, analysts believe First United is more attractive than Midland States Bancorp.

Midland States Bancorp has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.699% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First United has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.078%.

Midland States Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.68%. First United offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Midland States Bancorp pays 94.59% of its earnings as a dividend. First United pays out 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Midland States Bancorp quarterly revenues are $75.9M, which are larger than First United quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Midland States Bancorp's net income of $14.8M is higher than First United's net income of $5.8M. Notably, Midland States Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while First United's PE ratio is 9.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Midland States Bancorp is 1.14x versus 2.68x for First United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 19.49% compared to Midland States Bancorp's net margin of 32.4%. Midland States Bancorp's return on equity of 6.86% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Midland States Bancorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Midland States Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Midland States Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

Midland States Bancorp has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.699% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Midland States Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.68%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Midland States Bancorp pays 94.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Midland States Bancorp quarterly revenues are $75.9M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Midland States Bancorp's net income of $14.8M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Midland States Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Midland States Bancorp is 1.14x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 19.49% compared to Midland States Bancorp's net margin of 24.09%. Midland States Bancorp's return on equity of 6.86% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Midland States Bancorp has a consensus price target of $19.33, signalling upside risk potential of 4.17%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Midland States Bancorp, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Midland States Bancorp.

Midland States Bancorp has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.699% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Midland States Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.68%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Midland States Bancorp pays 94.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Midland States Bancorp quarterly revenues are $75.9M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Midland States Bancorp's net income of $14.8M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Midland States Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.85x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Midland States Bancorp is 1.14x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.