MRCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CAM Group has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of --. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat CAM Group's return on equity of --.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $52.71, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand CAM Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercury Systems has higher upside potential than CAM Group, analysts believe Mercury Systems is more attractive than CAM Group.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CAM Group has a beta of -0.135, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.503%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CAM Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CAM Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are larger than CAM Group quarterly revenues of --. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is higher than CAM Group's net income of --. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CAM Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.41x versus -- for CAM Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 1.49%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.45%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $52.71, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $50.67 which suggests that it could fall by -6.66%. Given that Mercury Systems has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Mercury Systems is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.629%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $302.6M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 417.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.41x versus 7.29x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Network-1 Technologies has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of -242%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat Network-1 Technologies's return on equity of -5.43%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $52.71, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Network-1 Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercury Systems has higher upside potential than Network-1 Technologies, analysts believe Mercury Systems is more attractive than Network-1 Technologies.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Network-1 Technologies has a beta of 0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.757%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Network-1 Technologies offers a yield of 7.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Network-1 Technologies pays out -77.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are larger than Network-1 Technologies quarterly revenues of $150K. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Network-1 Technologies's net income of -$363K. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Network-1 Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.41x versus -- for Network-1 Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Aerospace has a net margin of -9.07% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 13.51%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -4.45% beat Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.44%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $52.71, signalling upside risk potential of 2%. On the other hand Park Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 50.2%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.708, which suggesting that the stock is 29.174% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.588%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park Aerospace offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park Aerospace pays out 171% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $211.4M, which are larger than Park Aerospace quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Park Aerospace's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park Aerospace's PE ratio is 50.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.41x versus 5.48x for Park Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.