MATW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks has a net margin of -2.09% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -0.94%. Matthews International's return on equity of -17.34% beat Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -145.7%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.31%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 416.22%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than Matthews International, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than Matthews International.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks has a beta of -0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.454%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Harte-Hanks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $427.6M, which are larger than Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues of $41.6M. Matthews International's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Harte-Hanks's net income of -$392K. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Harte-Hanks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.46x versus 0.14x for Harte-Hanks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NN has a net margin of -2.09% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -6.33%. Matthews International's return on equity of -17.34% beat NN's return on equity of -25.03%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.31%. On the other hand NN has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 203.03%. Given that NN has higher upside potential than Matthews International, analysts believe NN is more attractive than Matthews International.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NN has a beta of 2.038, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.838%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. NN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. NN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $427.6M, which are larger than NN quarterly revenues of $105.7M. Matthews International's net income of -$8.9M is lower than NN's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while NN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.46x versus 0.23x for NN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of -2.09% compared to Matthews International's net margin of -70.61%. Matthews International's return on equity of -17.34% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.31%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews International has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Matthews International is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.474%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $427.6M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Matthews International's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.46x versus 5.23x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of -2.09% compared to Matthews International's net margin of 1.38%. Matthews International's return on equity of -17.34% beat Seaboard's return on equity of 2.09%.

Matthews International has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 52.31%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews International has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Matthews International is more attractive than Seaboard.

Matthews International has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.588% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.949%.

Matthews International has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Matthews International pays -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Matthews International quarterly revenues are $427.6M, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Matthews International's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Seaboard's net income of $32M. Notably, Matthews International's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.15x while Seaboard's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews International is 0.46x versus 0.32x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.