MAPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expensify has a net margin of 3.69% compared to WM Technology's net margin of -8.79%. WM Technology's return on equity of 7% beat Expensify's return on equity of -7.83%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 175.9%. On the other hand Expensify has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 87.79%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Expensify, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Expensify.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expensify has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expensify offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Expensify pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $44.6M, which are larger than Expensify quarterly revenues of $36.1M. WM Technology's net income of $1.6M is higher than Expensify's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Expensify's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.51x versus 1.34x for Expensify. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 3.69% compared to WM Technology's net margin of -4.72%. WM Technology's return on equity of 7% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 175.9%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 160.62%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Inuvo.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $44.6M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. WM Technology's net income of $1.6M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.51x versus 0.78x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaltura has a net margin of 3.69% compared to WM Technology's net margin of -2.38%. WM Technology's return on equity of 7% beat Kaltura's return on equity of -89.06%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 175.9%. On the other hand Kaltura has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.44%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Kaltura, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Kaltura.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaltura has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaltura offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaltura pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $44.6M, which are smaller than Kaltura quarterly revenues of $47M. WM Technology's net income of $1.6M is higher than Kaltura's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Kaltura's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.51x versus 1.42x for Kaltura. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vimeo has a net margin of 3.69% compared to WM Technology's net margin of -3.8%. WM Technology's return on equity of 7% beat Vimeo's return on equity of 4.27%.

WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, signalling upside risk potential of 175.9%. On the other hand Vimeo has an analysts' consensus of $6.85 which suggests that it could grow by 74.3%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Vimeo, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Vimeo.

WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, which suggesting that the stock is 1.26% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vimeo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

WM Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vimeo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WM Technology pays 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Vimeo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WM Technology quarterly revenues are $44.6M, which are smaller than Vimeo quarterly revenues of $103M. WM Technology's net income of $1.6M is higher than Vimeo's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, WM Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.83x while Vimeo's PE ratio is 39.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WM Technology is 0.51x versus 1.59x for Vimeo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.