MAAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Maase's net margin of --. Maase's return on equity of -- beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

Maase has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maase has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe Maase is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

Maase has a beta of -0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 164.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maase quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Maase's net income of -- is lower than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Maase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maase is 0.06x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HDFC Bank has a net margin of -- compared to Maase's net margin of 25.7%. Maase's return on equity of -- beat HDFC Bank's return on equity of 12.02%.

Maase has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HDFC Bank has an analysts' consensus of $86.23 which suggests that it could grow by 13.9%. Given that HDFC Bank has higher upside potential than Maase, analysts believe HDFC Bank is more attractive than Maase.

Maase has a beta of -0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 164.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HDFC Bank has a beta of 0.639, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.068%.

Maase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HDFC Bank offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Maase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HDFC Bank pays out 23.47% of its earnings as a dividend. HDFC Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maase quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than HDFC Bank quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Maase's net income of -- is lower than HDFC Bank's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Maase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HDFC Bank's PE ratio is 23.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maase is 0.06x versus 8.71x for HDFC Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICICI Bank has a net margin of -- compared to Maase's net margin of 23.81%. Maase's return on equity of -- beat ICICI Bank's return on equity of 17.09%.

Maase has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICICI Bank has an analysts' consensus of $40.18 which suggests that it could grow by 20.75%. Given that ICICI Bank has higher upside potential than Maase, analysts believe ICICI Bank is more attractive than Maase.

Maase has a beta of -0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 164.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICICI Bank has a beta of 0.603, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.726%.

Maase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICICI Bank offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Maase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICICI Bank pays out 13.8% of its earnings as a dividend. ICICI Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maase quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ICICI Bank quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Maase's net income of -- is lower than ICICI Bank's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Maase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ICICI Bank's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maase is 0.06x versus 4.91x for ICICI Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LexinFintech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Maase's net margin of 13.86%. Maase's return on equity of -- beat LexinFintech Holdings's return on equity of 12.65%.

Maase has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LexinFintech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.55 which suggests that it could grow by 76.3%. Given that LexinFintech Holdings has higher upside potential than Maase, analysts believe LexinFintech Holdings is more attractive than Maase.

Maase has a beta of -0.644, which suggesting that the stock is 164.421% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LexinFintech Holdings has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.665%.

Maase has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LexinFintech Holdings offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Maase pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. LexinFintech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maase quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LexinFintech Holdings quarterly revenues of $426.7M. Maase's net income of -- is lower than LexinFintech Holdings's net income of $59.2M. Notably, Maase's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LexinFintech Holdings's PE ratio is 6.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maase is 0.06x versus 0.58x for LexinFintech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.