LYFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Webull has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Lyft's net margin of 11.15%. Lyft's return on equity of 8.54% beat Webull's return on equity of 0.47%.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $17.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand Webull has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than Webull, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than Webull.

Lyft has a beta of 2.202, which suggesting that the stock is 120.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Webull has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Webull offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Webull pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Webull quarterly revenues of $117.4M. Lyft's net income of $2.6M is lower than Webull's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.53x while Webull's PE ratio is 10.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.05x versus 14.21x for Webull. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CoreWeave has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Lyft's net margin of --. Lyft's return on equity of 8.54% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $17.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than CoreWeave.

Lyft has a beta of 2.202, which suggesting that the stock is 120.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. Lyft's net income of $2.6M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.53x while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.05x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Lyft's net margin of 2.9%. Lyft's return on equity of 8.54% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $17.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could grow by 61.22%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Lyft, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Lyft.

Lyft has a beta of 2.202, which suggesting that the stock is 120.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.713%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. Lyft's net income of $2.6M is lower than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.53x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 91.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.05x versus 2.47x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TaskUs has a net margin of 0.18% compared to Lyft's net margin of 7.61%. Lyft's return on equity of 8.54% beat TaskUs's return on equity of 11.42%.

Lyft has a consensus price target of $17.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.7%. On the other hand TaskUs has an analysts' consensus of $17.75 which suggests that it could grow by 3.86%. Given that Lyft has higher upside potential than TaskUs, analysts believe Lyft is more attractive than TaskUs.

Lyft has a beta of 2.202, which suggesting that the stock is 120.226% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TaskUs has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lyft has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TaskUs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lyft pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TaskUs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lyft quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than TaskUs quarterly revenues of $277.8M. Lyft's net income of $2.6M is lower than TaskUs's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Lyft's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.53x while TaskUs's PE ratio is 28.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lyft is 1.05x versus 1.52x for TaskUs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.