LUNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Momentus has a net margin of -18.23% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -1916.77%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -362.52% beat Momentus's return on equity of -4939.96%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 32.58%. On the other hand Momentus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56580.14%. Given that Momentus has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Momentus is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Momentus has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.226%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Momentus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Momentus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $62.5M, which are larger than Momentus quarterly revenues of $322K. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$11.4M is lower than Momentus's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Momentus's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.18x versus 1.44x for Momentus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Labs PBC has a net margin of -18.23% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -19.06%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -362.52% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -22.92%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 32.58%. On the other hand Planet Labs PBC has an analysts' consensus of $7.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.67%. Given that Intuitive Machines has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Intuitive Machines is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Labs PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Labs PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $62.5M, which are smaller than Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues of $66.3M. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$11.4M is higher than Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$12.6M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Planet Labs PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.18x versus 7.61x for Planet Labs PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outdoor Holding has a net margin of -18.23% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -22.81%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -362.52% beat Outdoor Holding's return on equity of -42.12%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 32.58%. On the other hand Outdoor Holding has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 41.67%. Given that Outdoor Holding has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Outdoor Holding is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outdoor Holding has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.017%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Outdoor Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding pays out -2.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $62.5M, which are larger than Outdoor Holding quarterly revenues of -$42.2M. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$11.4M is higher than Outdoor Holding's net income of -$77.5M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Outdoor Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.18x versus 2.86x for Outdoor Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sidus Space has a net margin of -18.23% compared to Intuitive Machines's net margin of -2689.64%. Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -362.52% beat Sidus Space's return on equity of -121.5%.

Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 32.58%. On the other hand Sidus Space has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 449.45%. Given that Sidus Space has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Sidus Space is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intuitive Machines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intuitive Machines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues are $62.5M, which are larger than Sidus Space quarterly revenues of $238.5K. Intuitive Machines's net income of -$11.4M is lower than Sidus Space's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Intuitive Machines's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Sidus Space's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intuitive Machines is 4.18x versus 5.03x for Sidus Space. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.