LNZA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Casella Waste Systems has a net margin of -202.77% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of -1.15%. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -354.84% beat Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.96%.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $1.35, signalling upside risk potential of 364.56%. On the other hand Casella Waste Systems has an analysts' consensus of $127.01 which suggests that it could grow by 15.63%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Casella Waste Systems, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Casella Waste Systems.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.285%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casella Waste Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casella Waste Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are smaller than Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues of $417.1M. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Casella Waste Systems's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casella Waste Systems's PE ratio is 499.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 1.18x versus 4.10x for Casella Waste Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of -202.77% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of -25.67%. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -354.84% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8%.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $1.35, signalling upside risk potential of 364.56%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 57.21%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.285, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.538%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $13.9M. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 1.18x versus 3.13x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -202.77% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of -304.87%. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -354.84% beat Titan Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -443.56%.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $1.35, signalling upside risk potential of 364.56%. On the other hand Titan Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Titan Environmental Solutions, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Titan Environmental Solutions.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Titan Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Titan Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are larger than Titan Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $1.8M. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Titan Environmental Solutions's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Titan Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 1.18x versus 5.81x for Titan Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a net margin of -202.77% compared to LanzaTech Global's net margin of 11.21%. LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -354.84% beat Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 10.69%.

LanzaTech Global has a consensus price target of $1.35, signalling upside risk potential of 364.56%. On the other hand Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $37.71 which suggests that it could grow by 3.21%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.111%.

LanzaTech Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. LanzaTech Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays out 35.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues are $9.5M, which are smaller than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues of $388.8M. LanzaTech Global's net income of -$19.2M is lower than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.6M. Notably, LanzaTech Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's PE ratio is 36.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LanzaTech Global is 1.18x versus 4.01x for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.