LESL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duluth Holdings has a net margin of -28.97% compared to Leslies's net margin of -14.89%. Leslies's return on equity of -- beat Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68%.

Leslies has a consensus price target of $1.37, signalling upside risk potential of 236.19%. On the other hand Duluth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.85%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Leslies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.779%.

Leslies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duluth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leslies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duluth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leslies quarterly revenues are $177.1M, which are larger than Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues of $102.7M. Leslies's net income of -$51.3M is lower than Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Leslies's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.00x while Duluth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leslies is 0.06x versus 0.11x for Duluth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Etsy has a net margin of -28.97% compared to Leslies's net margin of -8%. Leslies's return on equity of -- beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Leslies has a consensus price target of $1.37, signalling upside risk potential of 236.19%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $52.57 which suggests that it could fall by -6.19%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Etsy, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Etsy.

Leslies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.791%.

Leslies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leslies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leslies quarterly revenues are $177.1M, which are smaller than Etsy quarterly revenues of $651.2M. Leslies's net income of -$51.3M is higher than Etsy's net income of -$52.1M. Notably, Leslies's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.00x while Etsy's PE ratio is 40.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leslies is 0.06x versus 2.48x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -28.97% compared to Leslies's net margin of 1.14%. Leslies's return on equity of -- beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44%.

Leslies has a consensus price target of $1.37, signalling upside risk potential of 236.19%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 566.67%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Leslies, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Leslies.

Leslies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.942%.

Leslies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 17.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Leslies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Leslies quarterly revenues are $177.1M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Leslies's net income of -$51.3M is lower than Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K. Notably, Leslies's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.00x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 84.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leslies is 0.06x versus 1.21x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of -28.97% compared to Leslies's net margin of 5.17%. Leslies's return on equity of -- beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Leslies has a consensus price target of $1.37, signalling upside risk potential of 236.19%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $55.05 which suggests that it could fall by -1.76%. Given that Leslies has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Leslies is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Leslies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.604%.

Leslies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Leslies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Leslies quarterly revenues are $177.1M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Leslies's net income of -$51.3M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Leslies's price-to-earnings ratio is 151.00x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leslies is 0.06x versus 2.01x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.