KINS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 11.41%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat CorVel's return on equity of 33.58%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.75%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than CorVel.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.168%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than CorVel quarterly revenues of $231.5M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is lower than CorVel's net income of $26.4M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while CorVel's PE ratio is 52.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.14x versus 5.64x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eHealth has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 1.72%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat eHealth's return on equity of 4.17%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.75%. On the other hand eHealth has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 166.67%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth has a beta of 0.969, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.055%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth pays out 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than eHealth quarterly revenues of $113.1M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is higher than eHealth's net income of $2M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while eHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.14x versus 0.20x for eHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 3.1%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.75%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance has an analysts' consensus of $116.44 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.779%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is higher than Goosehead Insurance's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while Goosehead Insurance's PE ratio is 84.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.14x versus 10.88x for Goosehead Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance Global Group has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of -41%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -205.56%.

Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.75%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8339.72%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.571, which suggesting that the stock is 42.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.327, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.653%.

Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is higher than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.36x while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.14x versus 0.17x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.