JG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Infosys has a net margin of -2.87% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of 17.19%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -7.17% beat Infosys's return on equity of 29.75%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -42.86%. On the other hand Infosys has an analysts' consensus of $19.61 which suggests that it could grow by 6.03%. Given that Infosys has higher upside potential than Aurora Mobile, analysts believe Infosys is more attractive than Aurora Mobile.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Infosys has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.403%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Infosys offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys pays out 76.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Infosys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.2M, which are smaller than Infosys quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$350.8K is lower than Infosys's net income of $813M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Infosys's PE ratio is 24.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.55x versus 3.99x for Infosys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JinkoSolar Holding has a net margin of -2.87% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of -9.53%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -7.17% beat JinkoSolar Holding's return on equity of -5.5%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -42.86%. On the other hand JinkoSolar Holding has an analysts' consensus of $33.52 which suggests that it could grow by 43.98%. Given that JinkoSolar Holding has higher upside potential than Aurora Mobile, analysts believe JinkoSolar Holding is more attractive than Aurora Mobile.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JinkoSolar Holding has a beta of 0.215, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.518%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JinkoSolar Holding offers a yield of 12.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JinkoSolar Holding pays out 1004.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.2M, which are smaller than JinkoSolar Holding quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$350.8K is higher than JinkoSolar Holding's net income of -$181.3M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JinkoSolar Holding's PE ratio is 34.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.55x versus 0.10x for JinkoSolar Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VNET Group has a net margin of -2.87% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of -10.58%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -7.17% beat VNET Group's return on equity of 1.99%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -42.86%. On the other hand VNET Group has an analysts' consensus of $12.65 which suggests that it could grow by 43.93%. Given that VNET Group has higher upside potential than Aurora Mobile, analysts believe VNET Group is more attractive than Aurora Mobile.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.166%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.2M, which are smaller than VNET Group quarterly revenues of $308.8M. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$350.8K is higher than VNET Group's net income of -$32.7M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VNET Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.55x versus 2.07x for VNET Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wipro has a net margin of -2.87% compared to Aurora Mobile's net margin of 15.86%. Aurora Mobile's return on equity of -7.17% beat Wipro's return on equity of 16.22%.

Aurora Mobile has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -42.86%. On the other hand Wipro has an analysts' consensus of $2.68 which suggests that it could fall by -9.57%. Given that Aurora Mobile has more downside risk than Wipro, analysts believe Wipro is more attractive than Aurora Mobile.

Aurora Mobile has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.02% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wipro has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

Aurora Mobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wipro offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Aurora Mobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wipro pays out 47.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Wipro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aurora Mobile quarterly revenues are $12.2M, which are smaller than Wipro quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Aurora Mobile's net income of -$350.8K is lower than Wipro's net income of $412.1M. Notably, Aurora Mobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wipro's PE ratio is 20.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aurora Mobile is 1.55x versus 2.95x for Wipro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.